Tor browser and torrent

Это как tor browser ubuntu вход на гидру думаю

If you had an account on forum. Your account is still active and your Suprbay username and password will work. Thread Modes. Hello fellow Librarians! I developed a good technique to browse torrents more securely as well as retrieve the magnet link for your desired file. I use Ubuntu and install it with my home folder encrypted to make it near impossible to hack.

I also use transmission for its ease of use and the fact that it is open source makes it more trustworthy. I like using TOR to stifle any man in the middle attacks and to obscure your personal data over the internet for much better privacy and security. Using TOR browser you will notice that the magnet links do not work when you click on them. This is an inherent security feature in TOR, but you can still activate the link.

Here is how: Step 1. Right click on desired magnet link and select open in a new tab. Step 2. Copy the entire address bar. This is the actual link to the torrent Step 3. In Transmission or other software click file, then select add URL. This will add the magnet link to the program and it will begin to search for meta data right away as it should. Thanks guys and good torrent hunting!

You can right click on the magnet icon and select: Copy link location This puts the complete magnet link data in the clipboard and just hit the link icon in like qbittorent or uttorent and when the full magnet link details pops up just say ok. You can do this across systems if the clip board is shared. Yeah Tor works nicely to grab torrents. Sadly it seems unusable to upload stuff: I tried to create an account several times from the.

No point in providing an. Megaohmz Original Poster. Aug 17, , pm hypno-potamous Wrote: You can right click on the magnet icon and select: Copy link location This puts the complete magnet link data in the clipboard and just hit the link icon in like qbittorent or uttorent and when the full magnet link details pops up just say ok. Cool Thanks. Even faster now! Yea I would stay away from.

It is not necessary IMO. As far as Copywrite Trolls, It would be a good opportunity for me to teach a jury how to legally download content using the Fair Use Act as law in the courtroom! You have to represent yourself in court to be able to talk to a jury btw. Awesome thanks! Most torrent clients accept the info hash too to add a torrent. You may find that a little bit easier to do.

That puts too much load on the network. We should keep brainstorming about ways to protect users even when their applications are handing over their sensitive information. Seriously, this is bad for a large number of people. Torrents were already kinda dead, but this might slay them. Torrents are dead? How so? Bittorrent is probably the best way to share files right now and will be be for years. I use torrents on a regular basis, downloading everything save movies and music available in the United States with it.

Never gotten caught, never used protection until very recently protection being in the form of Peerblock. I2P is a "darknet" that supports Torrents very well. There are 2 good trackers with lots of uploads per day. Anomos is an option too but the tracker traffic is still "in the open" from what I know and there does not seem any good tracker around.

So tor could use this to identify it, its much better then using port 80, alot of trackers run on port 80 too so you cant use the port method to seperate trackers from websites. If the tracker communication is SSL you cant see the request, but then the exit node cant read it either so no attack.

Everyone using BT over TOR should be using a firewall to make sure their torrent app can only communicate with tor. Instead of separating ports by 80 and! Am I safe? Safe from what? The encryption on bittorent is good if your ISP is throttling bittorrent traffic. It hides your use of bittorrent from them Your ip address is still shared with the tracker and other users.

PeerGuardian blocks known lowlife ip addresses from connecting to you. What do you need to be "safe" from anyway? I think that it could be cool to have a new bit-torrent application made to work with TOR!!! You could even call it "TORrent"!!! I think that something of missing in Tor is a robust publishing system to share documents, in a way to resist to the shut-down of a single server!!!!

You can have some "hidden services" those addresses ending with ". All TORrent clients should be enabled as internal tor nodes, for the whole TOR network to share the global network load too!!! Yeah, i think this could actually work!!!!! So, you can send your. You can then connect to the. In this way, you can avoid to have a congestion in the network!!! You should read this article too!!! It is great because politicians understand child pornography. By playing that card , we can get them to act , and start blocking sites.

And once they have done that , we can get them to start blocking file sharing sites. Ever thought about bee wanting to disguise himself by using exclamation and a certain style of writing. Start thinking, stop complaining! I do think that bee lovers are actually bee posting without exclamation point ;-. You make a lot of points that I agree with. Tor needs many more relays. A BitTORrent system could easily provide that as it would offer an incentive to everyday users to want to engage in the Tor network.

I certainly would, if it was done right. One comment from a Chinese Tor user in a recent blog post here said it quite well to me. To paraphrase it went something like: "How come they [GFW] can stop Tor, but file-sharing works fine? The total is certainly in the many millions out there. But what has Tor? Less than nodes at the moment? But, about here is where things start to get political, I guess. Now we have an example of at least one of those ways.

This is secondary to the problem of any bulk file transfers over tor that cause pain for everyone in the network. This patch went in with 0. We control the future of Tor. If someone wants to see certain features in Tor, they are welcome to discuss it with us. However, everything we do is released into the open, with source code, commit trails, and specifications. There are other networks willing to take your bulk file transfer traffic, such as bitblinder, i2p, freenet, gnunet, etc. However, they exist.

I know the technology, and I also know that those things the research here highlight are trivial fixes to overcome. Even now with the proper configuration of an appropriate client can these issues be overcome. You are, in effect, trying to stifle some aspect of users using the network to freely access and exchange information. By the way I contribute relays myself. I totally support the idea of Tor, and appreciate the work that has gone into it.

I will still criticise it though. My bulk traffic? There are many options around that happily handle BT and happen to have applications built around the protocol , namely I2P2, why not suggest everyone use that instead of focking with Tor and reducing the experience for the rest of us? Are you incapable of reading the post I wrote?

Why are you attempting to infer that I use Tor as it is now for BitTorrenting? Did you miss the part where I mentioned I run relays and am aware of the problem of BitTorrent or heavy usage type in general? What I am saying is that users will and do use Tor for bulk data exchange, and may possibly continue to do so in ever increasing numbers as a method of anonymising to a sufficient degree their file-sharing activities. I think a problem with Tor is that there are not that many people willing to run systems for the purposes you mention.

The Tor network has proven easy to block. It is probably also very easy for them to monitor who exactly is using it if not what for. But what creates an incentive for people to want to do that? Web browsing comparred to bulk data sharing is like a flea biting an elephant. The resources availiable could be huge for the purposes of providing a system for anonymous access to the Internet.

No government could block it if it was that popular. People would be happy to participate in the network if it satisfied their interests. Exits could enjoy far less loads placed upon them due to an internalised sharing system. Bridges may be entirely unnecessary. Look how popular this blog post is.

File-sharing is massively popular. Look at the size of those networks comparred to Tor. Both attempt to break down attempts to control access to, and the dissemination of, information through a system of decentralisation. Now times are changing a bit, new threats are emerging, and as a consequence popular file-sharing networks are being driven to look towards systems of anonymisation. One obvious way to achieve that is through proxying networks like Tor where data is relayed in and out of every participant leaving no indication as to what the data is and where it came from.

A system that could really break systems, not pander to special interests. Freedom to publish. Freedom to access. Freedom to remain anonymous. Censorship resistant. A popularised, ubiquitous, system that cannot easily be controlled. Best of luck with your ambition of changing the way people use the Tor network. And, guess what BitTorrent is able to do?!!!!!! I think that the main problem, always pointed out, about the Tor network load, is described in a very biased way!!!!!!!!

People using the «HTTP. I really think that a "BitTORrent Bundle", made with a patched version of a BitTorrent-client made to work within the Tor Network, and made with the original idea to share ALSO the network load and not just the files , to be a very good idea!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BitTorrent is only a protocol!! What about the bulk traffic and why are big files useful for the Tor Network?!!! Why were you asking it to me though?!!!!!!! Somebody could say that BitTorrent and Tor are both useless!!! Also factorbee is useless for people using exclusively Windows, because it works only on Linux!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Could the TorProject be liable for «helping the development of file sharing technologies»?!!!!!!!!!!!! Lets say communist software? In either case, i think that my BitTORrent idea is very nice, and it could work for real!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The problem in your logic is few er people download big files with Tor via. HTTP than do with Tor via. I could live with the exclamation marks if there were any paragraph breaks, but the combination is hopeless.

I just skip right on past. I agree, why would anybody post anything more than 4 lines with out line breaks or paragraphs.. Having said that I agree with this idea and its occurred to me as well, that bittorrent and tor can make things work very well if they can work cooperatively together. Where bittorrent traffic has to never exit the tor network, this will frustrate any attempts to eves drop on tor and make it much more resilient giving it protection of hiding in the crowd.

There was some work done in the last few years by a company making routers to identify and prioritize "data streams" as opposed to packets. They extolled the virtues of this new approach specifically with regards to improving video streaming and of easily throttling BT traffic - both without the need for deep packet inspection.

I find this similar, conceptually, to your "separate streams per destination port" idea. Apart from that your connection to all the other peers is through relays like tor. There are works in progress for bigger anomos-based.

Bittorrent is not just for illegal usages. Users of my linux distribution commonly download over tor using bittorrent. They will now be identified and possibly pushed to fake mirrors downloading infected versions of linux. We should update our instructions to block udp, force torrents over tcp over tor. I do not have permission to say this by the company, so I will not name the linux distribution. However, I work for a commercial linux company. Use Anomos! As of 0. It can even convert old torrent files to atorrents.

It uses Tor-style onion layer encryption and the only weak point is the tracker must be trusted, however they run their own tracker as well, so one could expect a reasonable amount of privacy. The anonmos trackers could just as well be owned, operated or under orders from the entities you fear the most. The only real solution is standard bittorrent clients using strong anon networks. Phantom is a strong future contender provided they interface with OnionCat.

I2P is sufficient today. Just fire it up, set your node to give whatever bandwidth you can give. Maybe tor client shoul create some small number of circuits and load balance requests bteewen them. Of course there is need to be a way to nesure that all circuits are using diffrent exit nodes. The best way to download illegal things its obviously just hacking some random chinese server, put rTorrent or cTorrent, download the torrent maybe some seeding , download file from the hacked server using http or ftp or whatever u like, clean the logs, disappear for a while ;.

People who really need Tor, e. Stop being so selfish! Stop using Tor for BT traffic! In fact all of the discussed privacy leaks can be easily eliminated. It appears that arma got entirely confused here. Please read the paper again and perhaps quote some supporting paragraphs. This attack does not build on the first one, but simply exploits DHT correlations.

Again, the solution is trivial - disable DHT. This one is not even interesting and there is no need to wait for developers to resolve the weakness. All you have to do is run a second instance of Tor on a different "SocksPort". Yes, it works on Windows too - flawlessly. Secondly, deploy an egress firewall and limit BT to localhost traffic only.

As they will contact that service through Tor, the service will report the IP address of an exit node. No, there are no services involved, the clients learn their IPs from each other and exchange them on the extension protocol handshake. Just like Firefox needs Totbutton, so does Bittorrent require a few specific configuration settings.

Usenet is not the answer.

Это забавная тор браузер это прокси гирда какой